Home
Liam Lawson’s abrupt exit from Red Bull’s lineup after just two races has sent shockwaves through Formula 1. The 23-year-old Kiwi, once hailed as a rising star, found himself demoted to sister team Racing Bulls—a stark fall from chasing podiums to scraping for points. While critics blame performance, the real culprit lies deeper: F1’s stringent testing rules.
Designed to curb costs, these regulations have inadvertently shackled young talents like Lawson, leaving them unprepared for the relentless demands of the grid. As Red Bull pivots, the sport’s regulatory tightrope comes under fire.
F1’s testing clampdown: Liam Lawson’s worst nightmare
Lawson’s struggles trace back to F1’s draconian testing limits. Despite a promising six-race stint in 2024, he entered 2025 as a de facto rookie, barred from critical practice sessions reserved for drivers with fewer than two Grand Prix starts. Red Bull’s hands were tied: reserve driver duties left Lawson ineligible for rookie FP1 runs, forcing the team to prioritize Isack Hadjar for young driver tests.
The result? Liam Lawson squeezed into the RB21 with just 149 laps from Bahrain’s pre-season test—a fraction of the preparation veterans like Lewis Hamilton enjoyed in the mid-2000s.
The contrast is jarring. In 2007, Hamilton clocked over 1,000 laps before his debut, while Lawson’s 2025 prep included a single filming day and a tire test. F1’s shift from unlimited testing to a cost-capped era—now allowing just three pre-season days and zero in-season runs—has turned rookies into crash-course students.
From golden age to gridlock: How testing rules evolved
F1’s testing landscape once thrived on freedom. Teams could run current cars endlessly, nurturing raw talents like Kimi Räikkönen and Fernando Alonso through relentless laps. By 2008, restrictions began chipping away at this luxury, capping distances and banning post-season tests. By 2023, pre-season testing dwindled to three days, with development frozen outside Pirelli’s tire trials.
For Lawson, this meant learning mid-race. Unlike Mercedes’ Kimi Antonelli—who prepped in a 2022 car via F1’s “Testing Previous Cars” (TPC) loophole—Red Bull didn’t invest in similar runs. TPC, though useless for upgrades, offers rookies critical seat time. Antonelli’s seamless transition to Mercedes’ 2025 car highlights its value, while Liam Lawson’s sink-or-swim baptism exposed its absence.
The domino effect: When cost-cutting clashes with talent
Carlos Sainz’s recent struggles at Williams echo Lawson’s plight. The Spaniard, a three-time race winner, admitted even seasoned drivers grapple with F1’s stingy testing: “A day and a half isn’t enough for rookies. TPC helps, but nothing replaces real track time.” Sainz’s frustration underscores a widening gap: cost controls prioritize fairness but sacrifice development.
Red Bull’s dilemma was twofold. With Sergio Pérez initially secured for 2025, Lawson’s late promotion left no window for TPC prep. Racing Bulls’ understeer-prone car further muddled his adaptation, creating a “muscle memory” mismatch with Red Bull’s edgier RB21.
What’s next for Formula1’s young guns?
Liam Lawson’s demotion is a wake-up call. Teams must now weigh talent against logistical hurdles, balancing cost caps with creative prep. Mercedes’ TPC strategy with Antonelli offers a blueprint, but it’s pricey and unregulated. For Red Bull, the lesson is clear: future rookies need preemptive investment, not last-minute gambles.
As F1’s calendar balloons to 24 races, the sport faces a reckoning. Can it preserve financial parity without stifling stars? For Lawson, the answer came too late—but his story might just reshape the rulebook.
