Home
KL Rahul's contentious dismissal in the first Test match between Australia and India in Perth's Optus Stadium has sparked massive controversy. The batter was clearly upset after being declared caught behind off Mitchell Starc's bowling by the third umpire. Rahul received a good-length ball from Starc that appeared to travel to Alex Carey, the wicket-keeper. Australia promptly chose to have the ball reviewed after on-field umpire Richard Kettleborough initially declared it not out, which led third umpire Richard Illingworth to assess the evidence.
Third umpire overturns decision despite uncertainty
Snickometer replays revealed a distinct spike that would indicate an edge, but the images were not conclusive. It was unclear if the noise was caused by the bat striking the pad or brushing against the ball. The side-on replay, which showed the bat and pad positioned closely together, made things even more difficult because there was no clear front-on angle available. Rahul was declared out by the third umpire, who reversed the on-field ruling despite this uncertainty.
KL Rahul was definitely not impressed. He could not understand why the third umpire had not looked at another perspective. The leg-umpire's view was the sole camera angle that was utilized. Replays showed that the bat appeared to hit the pad, and there was scant proof that the ball edged the bat. When the third umpire dismissed Rahul, he was stunned by his good fortune. As he made his way back to the dressing room, the opening batter was expressing his dissatisfaction by shaking his head.
Robin Uthappa's furious reaction
The former Indian cricketer and 2007 T20 World Cup winning wicket-keeper batter Robin Uthappa was extremely furious over this bizarre decision. KL Rahul was taking a strong stand for India at a time where India lost quick wickets, so his departure was a massive blow to India.
"What the F@&* is this decision???? This is a joke! #BGT2025," Robin Uthappa wrote from this official 'X' account.
"How a third umpire decides without accessing all angles!! Poor!! Just Piss poor!! #BGT2025," wrote Uthappa in his second tweet.
The International Cricket Council (ICC) regulations states that in order to overturn an on-field umpire's judgment, there must be compelling evidence. But in that case, it appeared that there was no solid proof. After Rahul was declared out, the broadcasters were actually able to display another angle, this time from the bowler's side. Even in that clip it was unclear whether Rahul hit the ball or not.
The ruling has sparked debate regarding the DRS system's efficacy, especially in cases where conclusive visual proof is lacking. Although the Snickometer showed a spike, it was difficult to determine if the pad or bat was to blame, and the absence of a clear side-on video made matters more complicated. The conclusion was unclear since Rahul appeared to claim that his bat had struck the pad rather than the ball following a protracted battle.
