Home
The debate over a prime Conor McGregor versus a prime Khabib Nurmagomedov has reignited, thanks to UFC commentator Joe Rogan’s bold take. While their 2018 clash saw Khabib dominate, Rogan argues that a peak McGregor—untethered by distractions like his boxing foray—could’ve rewritten history.
Was Khabib’s grappling too suffocating even for McGregor’s lethal striking? Or would the Irishman’s precision and power have flipped the script? As fans dissect this mythical matchup, Rogan’s insights fuel a fiery “what if” that transcends their real-world showdown.
“A Different Fight” If Conor McGregor Faced Khabib Nurmagomedov at His Sharpest
Joe Rogan’s stance hinges on timing. He believes the McGregor who starched Eddie Alvarez in 2016 to claim the UFC lightweight title—a version brimming with unshakable confidence and razor-sharp MMA instincts—would’ve posed a far stiffer challenge to Khabib than the one we saw at UFC 229. By 2018, Conor McGregor had spent months training exclusively for boxing during his Floyd Mayweather bout, leaving his kicks, takedown defense, and overall MMA rhythm rusty.
“You’re not doing leg kicks, no nothing—all you’re doing is boxing,” Rogan noted on his podcast, emphasizing how this shift diluted McGregor’s multifaceted game.
In contrast, Khabib Nurmagomedov entered UFC 229 as an undefeated grappling phenom, fresh off mauling contenders like Al Iaquinta and Edson Barboza. His relentless pressure and chain wrestling drowned McGregor in deep waters, culminating in a fourth-round submission. Yet Rogan insists prime McGregor—the one who blended spinning kicks, fluid movement, and fight-ending left hands—might’ve kept the fight standing long enough to land a fight-altering blow.
Style vs. System: Breaking Down the Hypothetical Battle
Conor McGregor’s prime (2015–2016) was defined by surgical striking and psychological warfare. His ability to snipe opponents with counter-lefts, paired with unorthodox techniques like the question-mark kick, made him a nightmare for strikers. But Khabib’s prime was a masterclass in control. The Dagestani’s smothering top game, coupled with his ability to chain takedowns against the cage, neutralized even elite strikers like Rafael dos Anjos and Michael Johnson.
Rogan’s theory hinges on whether McGregor’s takedown defense—tested sparingly in his prime—could withstand Khabib Nurmagomedov ’s onslaught. While McGregor stuffed early shots against Chad Mendes in 2015, Khabib’s grappling is a different beast. Conversely, if McGregor could mirror his Alvarez performance—landing 82% of his significant strikes—would Khabib’s chin hold up? History shows Khabib never faltered, but McGregor’s left hand remains MMA’s great equalizer.
While Khabib’s 2018 victory is etched in stone, the “prime vs. prime” debate lives in the realm of fantasy—one where fight fans and pundits alike endlessly dissect variables. Rogan’s argument isn’t about rewriting history but spotlighting how preparation, timing, and focus shape outcomes. Whether you side with Conor McGregor’s knockout artistry or Khabib Nurmagomedov’s relentless grind, one truth endures: this dream matchup remains a tantalizing “what if” in combat sports lore.
