Kansas City Chiefs opt against long-term contract for star running back following Super Bowl loss

Kansas City Chiefs decline long-term deal for star running back post-Super Bowl loss. Discover how cap constraints and RB volatility shaped their decision.

Profile

SportsTak Desk

Kansas City Chiefs opt against long-term contract for star running back following Super Bowl loss

Kansas City Chiefs in the frame (via Getty)

Highlights:

The Kansas City Chiefs are making tough roster decisions in the wake of their crushing Super Bowl LIX defeat.

The franchise is prioritizing future flexibility over sentimentality.

The Kansas City Chiefs are making tough roster decisions in the wake of their crushing Super Bowl LIX defeat, starting with a surprising move involving one of their standout players. After falling short in their quest for a historic three-peat against the Philadelphia Eagles—a 40-22 blowout that exposed flaws in their offense—the franchise is prioritizing future flexibility over sentimentality.

With stars like Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce struggling to deliver in the title game, the Chiefs are reshaping their lineup. Among the casualties? A key running back whose future in Kansas City now hangs in the balance.

RB’s uncertain future: Cap crunch and injury woes fuel decision

The Kansas City Chiefs’ reluctance to extend Isiah Pacheco stems from a mix of financial pragmatism and durability concerns. Despite outperforming his seventh-round draft pedigree—racking up 1,765 scrimmage yards and 14 touchdowns over two seasons—Pacheco’s injury history and the volatile nature of the running back position have cooled the team’s enthusiasm.

Kansas City’s tight salary cap situation complicates matters further. With 44 million already tied to franchise−tagged guard Trey Smith and Travis Kelce’s hefty contract, the Chiefs face a deficit heading into free agency. Letting Pacheco play out the final year of his rookie deal (1.1 million cap hit) allows them to allocate resources elsewhere, like retaining defensive anchors Nick Bolton and Justin Reid.

Pacheco’s 2024 season was marred by injuries, sidelining him for eight games. For a team eyeing roster upgrades, betting on a healthier, cost-effective alternative—like 2023 standout Kareem Hunt—makes fiscal sense.

Why running backs remain expendable in the NFL

Pacheco’s situation underscores a league-wide trend: teams are wary of investing long-term in running backs. The position’s physical toll and replaceability—evident in Pacheco’s own late-draft rise—make extensions risky. Kansas City’s success with undrafted gems like Hunt only reinforces this mindset.

While Pacheco could stage a holdout to force a deal or trade, his leverage is limited. As history shows, the Kansas City Chiefs are prepared to pivot, prioritizing cap health over emotional attachments.

What’s next for the Kansas City Chiefs?

Kansas City’s focus now shifts to rebuilding a roster that faltered when it mattered most. Letting Pacheco walk in 2025 frees up cap space to address glaring needs, like bolstering their offensive line or adding defensive depth. For Pacheco, a prove-it year offers a chance to silence doubters—or audition for a bigger payday elsewhere.

In the cutthroat NFL, loyalty takes a backseat to logic. For the Kansas City Chiefs, that means betting on the future, not the past.

    Share